In this paper, I discuss which semantic theory moral subjectivists should adopt.Moral subjectivism is understood broadly to include all theories according to which moral sentences are truth-apt, at least sometimes true, and made true by the mental attitudes of certain relevant agent Garden Hoses or set of agents.Due to the breadth of this definition, an initial concern is whether a Stove Thermocouple unified semantic approach is able to accommodate all varieties of subjectivism.
I argue that it is.I then proceed to analyse the main semantic theories for moral sentences as they apply to the standard issue of moral disagreements.I conclude in favour of so-called Non-Indexical Contextualism.